MightyOne wrote:for_Mira.png
Thank you MO!
This is what I'm seeing on your minichart:

upload image
Moderator: moderators

MightyOne wrote: In my mind, a 1-2-3 only has 3 parts: (1) a new extreme, (2) a breakout away from a price level, & (3) a return to said level.
The real entry is the #3 point, the #2 has actually been used for many years as a place to take partial profits (Joe Ross, etc) & you
can see that there is still profit taking at the #2 when you look at this chart:
for_Mira.png
IS A LIE__________

Mira wrote:I was lost trying to draw some angle but they are not making any sense to me, so it's better stay on classic stuff![]()
Thanks for the chart + explanation.. I was thinking that the entry for a 1-2-3 was after the 3, at the break of 2 or at the pullback![]()
This is why I have always thought that a 1-2-3 was a "late entry" strategy, but if the entry is at the 3 then isn't it just like a pattern and breakout?
MightyOne wrote: That is exactly what it is.
for_Mira.png

Jalarupa wrote:I would think that whether you label the LH or HL (vice versa) as 2 or 3 it doesn't matter... what matters is the move... a 1-2-3 breaks out and makes a HH or a LL eventually... the point is you enter on the Limit Order (pullback) and re-enter on the pullback back to the origin of the breakout (zline) to get the most out of the move...
The benefit to this is your average price stays well distanced from current market...

IS A LIE__________nat wrote:MightyOne wrote: That is exactly what it is.
for_Mira.png
ive seen you say "where did it come from, where did it go" quite a bit. so the 1 is where it came from, 2 is where it went and 3 is where to enter preferably. seems easy in my head but you all know how it goes

IS A LIE__________
IS A LIE__________