
Week 9; Ending: Feb, 26
-20.7%
Entries: 56
33.4% Targets: -2/8 ⇒ $1500

I pretty much had a fatal attraction to GJ this week, 95% of my trades were there. Basically, the week started with the +150 pip gap, and I became determined to trade off the weekly low to close it...as I was getting stopped out, I would decide to stop trading, but then every few hours later, I would see that the weekly extreme kept moving lower and lower, and so the reward of closing the gap at 16:1lev became higher and higher, and therefore more attractive for me to make further attempts.
Within all these trades off the week low, I did manage some entries that were really profitable at first, I didn't close them b/c I was totally blinded by my goals; this has forced me to once again, REALLY think about my attitude towards TP's & Re-Entries. Also, to think about how aggressively I tend to add-in... On a pair like GJ, I'll add-in too aggressively, not leaving enough room for possible pullbacks, and so I end up gaining nothing on trades that actually started out with a LOT of gained pips.
I finally realized (a bit too late) that the best way for me to trade GJ would be to start at 2:1lev instead of the 4:1lev that the calculations for my other pairs are done at.
My 4:1lev calculations are done with a 30pip SL in mind and the GJ cuts through that pretty easily. 2:1lev and 60pips would work much better and I'd still be able to gather pips quickly and proceed with doubling entries and such.
Three doubles would get me to 16:1lev, and since GJ max lev is @18:1, I would pretty much be maxed out.
Oh, and here is my currency lineup going forward: {I can't decide if I'll keep EU there or not, for whatever reason, it is a pair that I've always shied away from trading.}:

Anywayz, GJ will come out of my trading lineup for a while, I don't need any temptations to try to revenge trade it.
On the plus side, now that the week is over, I've finally been able to fully cool down, and I am ready to continue next week following my regular risk profile.
















but...)









