
im lost...back to reading....
Moderator: moderators
Sandra wrote::(
im lost...back to reading....
MightyOne wrote:
That is true, [highlight=yellow]context is everything in trading[/highlight].
Alan88 wrote:I don't get it MO, you say 'trailing the STOP LOSS behind the EXTREMES of said large chart', then you say 'We NEVER physically move a stop unless we are normalizing risk', then 'small charts for reduced risk:', and here comes the chart, where you move a SL from D2 + EX to H4 EX (or smaller). To me it doesn't make sense. Or maybe 'normalizing risk' and 'reducing risk' does not mean the same?
MightyOne wrote:Alan88 wrote:I don't get it MO, you say 'trailing the STOP LOSS behind the EXTREMES of said large chart', then you say 'We NEVER physically move a stop unless we are normalizing risk', then 'small charts for reduced risk:', and here comes the chart, where you move a SL from D2 + EX to H4 EX (or smaller). To me it doesn't make sense. Or maybe 'normalizing risk' and 'reducing risk' does not mean the same?
Your stop trails closer to the current price because you are increasing your position size & normalizing risk.
Example: if you place your stop at an extreme and then double your lot size then you must cut your space in half (trailing your stop) to bring your risk back to your initial risk level.
We DO NOT MOVE STOPS without first ADDING to our POSITION SIZE.
LONG TERM you want your stop to trail the LONG TERM extremes.
SHORT TERM you want to increase your size ahead of the long term chart resuming its trend.
In other words, at the end of the day(s) you want your position to trail the LONG TERM EXTREMES.
You can get away with a slightly weaker position over the short term.
Trading is a balancing act between position size and position safety.
If you follow my template then your risk will automatically be reduced:
1) If you are willing to risk 0.75% & end up initiating a trade at a better price then your initial risk drops.
2) When you double your size at a better price than say the lowest price at which you can double but you place your stop as if you had 2x at the lowest price then your risk is reduced.
3) Halving your space after increasing your position size by 50% reduces your risk.
TheRumpledOne wrote:MightyOne wrote:Alan88 wrote:I don't get it MO, you say 'trailing the STOP LOSS behind the EXTREMES of said large chart', then you say 'We NEVER physically move a stop unless we are normalizing risk', then 'small charts for reduced risk:', and here comes the chart, where you move a SL from D2 + EX to H4 EX (or smaller). To me it doesn't make sense. Or maybe 'normalizing risk' and 'reducing risk' does not mean the same?
Your stop trails closer to the current price because you are increasing your position size & normalizing risk.
Example: if you place your stop at an extreme and then double your lot size then you must cut your space in half (trailing your stop) to bring your risk back to your initial risk level.
We DO NOT MOVE STOPS without first ADDING to our POSITION SIZE.
LONG TERM you want your stop to trail the LONG TERM extremes.
SHORT TERM you want to increase your size ahead of the long term chart resuming its trend.
In other words, at the end of the day(s) you want your position to trail the LONG TERM EXTREMES.
You can get away with a slightly weaker position over the short term.
Trading is a balancing act between position size and position safety.
If you follow my template then your risk will automatically be reduced:
1) If you are willing to risk 0.75% & end up initiating a trade at a better price then your initial risk drops.
2) When you double your size at a better price than say the lowest price at which you can double but you place your stop as if you had 2x at the lowest price then your risk is reduced.
3) Halving your space after increasing your position size by 50% reduces your risk.
"If you follow my template then your risk will automatically be reduced: "
What template, MO? Did/can you upload it?