Its OPM$ Or OP$ for short.
Other Peoples Money!
Add this to your balance sheet, its an intregal part. lol
I'll post why 95% of traders lose later today. I wrote a short diatribe.
Moderator: moderators


bredin wrote:D+...
y'know small charts
newscalper,
Space is both sword and shield.
ok
I think youre having trouble seeing both aspects.
maybe
The fist job of Space is to protect your *capital*
yes
The second is to use 'other peoples money' (ie profit) to grow your capital.
Risk is only assessed on capital
It's not OPM, once it's there in your account it's your money and therefore also your capital, your capital has increased
This is a leveraged environment, like the property market. Lets take an example from property...
ok
I use 10k to buy a house worth 100k. it appreciates to 120k. so I have (held) profit of 20k, right?
ok
If the price of the house falls to 110k, have I taken a loss?
yes: I understand the mind trick but you still have a drawdown of 10k however you look at it, all you are doing is saying the money is not yours until you sell the house, the money IS yours and you just lost 10K, you had 30K, now you only have 20K. I'm going to write this very quick so the maths may go wrong..Also you have to consider the downside which is this: You buy your house for 100K with 10K, leveraging at 10:1, it appreciates in value by 10K and you sell. You now have enough to leverage for 2 100K houses. You buy and do the same. Then on to 3 houses. Only this time they do not go up in value, they fall in value by 15K. Now what do you do? Even if you manage to sell before going into negative equity, say at 10K loss (that's your I/T) you are right back at 0, you then buy 1 house and again it falls 10K, what do you then do? To say you have not lost anything apart from on the last transaction is purely an accounting trick by saying the money was not yours in the first place. I argue that it was/ Also, unless you're pretty damn careful/lucky when things DO go belly up with that much leverage they will unwind mighty fast, isn't that what's just happened in the world?
The foundation of space is the separation of account into two parts.
yes, I understand that
One part generates your available leverage, the other is the amount you are willing to risk. Almost all traders see no difference in the two functions, money at risk is also used for leverage...
yes, do you agree that both accounts actually contain YOUR money, and what do you do, after a series of losses when you no longer have enough 'space' to continue without taking money from your leverage account and adding it to your space account? What's the difference?
and money used for leverage is also at risk.
given my example above, it always is, it's no different to blowing out your account and having to refund it from somewhere else
They try to 'fix' this by trading below their accounts maximum leverage. After all, at 100:1 leverage your account is gone in 100 pips... so they create space for themselves by lowering their lotsize, and limit the amount of this expanded space they are willing to risk in one hit (ie stoploss).
This system is flawed, since after the initial deposit all capital is at risk, sliced into thin parts, and discarded piecemeal.
How I see it, it still is
With space we take the held profit (ie other peoples money It's your moneys) and put that at risk, and our capital is used to leverage the position.
If our account value falls, just like in the property example, it does not matter I think you may feel differently next time you take a large hit? since space has done its job in protecting our capital.
Now if you had the property mentioned above, would you wait for the yearly candle to close before you sold it if your I/T was at 115k?
Now that's an interesting one, if you're saying if price hits 115k I sell then that's no different to a stop loss, price hits the line and you sell (albeit you can't sell a property just like that), I thought the whole point of an I/T was that unless some kind of bar actually CLOSED over it you kept the trade open therefore avoiding being spiked out and if your criteria is a you wait for a yearly period then yes you wait for the yearly bar to close?confused
G.

MightyOne wrote:I am so tired of the your money their money argument...
Space is like buying into a poker tournament; at any given time you could have positive equity in the prize but the tournament is not over until you win or lose the last chip.
You could say, because you paid $10,000 to enter and recieved 10,000 in chips, that each chip (see pip) is worth $1 but you are only mind fking yourself if you think that way.

