-High-low is confirmed if it leads to new low-high, correct?
So on this example, isn't the 3rd high (the one with the question mark) the actual confirmed one, since it lead to new low (body over previous low)?

Moderator: moderators


judokamak wrote:I watched all of them (the masterclass playlist), but i'm sure i missed a lot of details. Which video were you referring to specifically?

aliassmith wrote:Arrow protected low?
Can the 20 sma still be a bias?

aliassmith wrote:judokamak wrote:I watched all of them (the masterclass playlist), but i'm sure i missed a lot of details. Which video were you referring to specifically?
Sorry that dirty dog deleted it already. I knew I should have copied it. I'll write something up when I get a chance, unless Prochargedmopar has a copy of it.

kiwiarian wrote:aliassmith wrote:judokamak wrote:I watched all of them (the masterclass playlist), but i'm sure i missed a lot of details. Which video were you referring to specifically?
Sorry that dirty dog deleted it already. I knew I should have copied it. I'll write something up when I get a chance, unless Prochargedmopar has a copy of it.
This one here explains the structure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O1_MSMVBPc
and video 1 goes into it on his playlist.

aliassmith wrote:Arrow protected low?
Can the 20 sma still be a bias?

aliassmith wrote:kiwiarian wrote:aliassmith wrote:
Sorry that dirty dog deleted it already. I knew I should have copied it. I'll write something up when I get a chance, unless Prochargedmopar has a copy of it.
This one here explains the structure
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-O1_MSMVBPc
and video 1 goes into it on his playlist.
Ya but that last video was really good.