Aliassmith Beats a "Dead Horse"

[Don_xyZ]

Now that's a sleek looking assistant

It's this one.

It's basically Ninjatrader for MT5.

So your name is Alfiya Fazylova?

All the more reasons for me to step up my coding skills not wanting to become the best coder there is, just enough so I can make whatever it is my mind can come up with.

[Don_xyZ]

My cognitive functionality has returned as far as I can tell.

This means I am going back to trading with what I learned from MightyOne.

I have nothing against ICT and FVGs but MightyOne was the best "mentor" .

I mean he explained things in a peculiar way, but he had a way to think about the market that resonates with me.

Zero Lines - Orderflow
Structure - Bias
Support and Resistance are traded through and tested not traded to - Bias
Time frames within timeframes - Risk Management

These things are what Ill mainly use.
They can be seen on the last chart I posted.

I agree with you 100% or I would not still be on Krelik or constantly quoting him to the world outside of here.
Even to Dave and ICTs Crews. They mostly look back at me like this....

But now I'm putting pics of IgazI's posts in other discords. WTF?
I know the best philosophy when I see it, just Having trouble harnessing it so I can show it off to the UNbelievers. Bahahahaha

Well yeah, it's safe to say that everyone who stays and/or active in here, me included of course, is influenced one way or another by MO. Only someone who's incredibly ungrateful will say no.

[prochargedmopar]

Now that's a sleek looking assistant

It's this one.

It's basically Ninjatrader for MT5.

I use it on MT4, would be lost without it now.

That works on mt4 or is it another one you use?

[kiwiarian]

It's this one.

It's basically Ninjatrader for MT5.

I use it on MT4, would be lost without it now.

That works on mt4 or is it another one you use?

MT4 TradePanel

TradePanelJPG.JPG (75.54 KiB) Viewed 691 times

[aliassmith]

My cognitive functionality has returned as far as I can tell.

This means I am going back to trading with what I learned from MightyOne.

I have nothing against ICT and FVGs but MightyOne was the best "mentor" .

I mean he explained things in a peculiar way, but he had a way to think about the market that resonates with me.

Zero Lines - Orderflow
Structure - Bias
Support and Resistance are traded through and tested not traded to - Bias
Time frames within timeframes - Risk Management

These things are what Ill mainly use.
They can be seen on the last chart I posted.

Hey Alias, exciting stuff.
I will be reading your posts with interest with questions in mind such as orderflow/z lines being identified on the current execution chart only? and how you identify structure/TF etc.
I watched the video Pro referred to from Dave doing structure on 1hr with validated highs and lows, will be interested to see what your version is.

What is the conceptual idea of the zline?

It is a point/price where buyers bought.
Price moves into profit.
Price returns back to the point where the buyer bought.
At this point in time the buyers are sitting with zero profit.

At face value it is merely a break and retest.
Most of these zero lines/break out points are returned to at some point.

This is the basis of orderflow, price moves up until sellers outnumber the buyers, price moves down until the buyers outnumber the sellers.
The orders tend to clump at the candle extremes. It can be observed on any timeframe. it is influenced by Stop Losses being placed at or near the break even price.

The edge comes from the high percentage of times price is rejected from the zero lines. We don't know how far price will reject only that much of the time it will reject and seek liquidity.

Note: If you believe in the 1 algo rules everything like ICT then none of this will make sense.

[aliassmith]

To examples of what was described in the previous post.

A: At the origin of the green line, we can see a candle breaks lower than the previous candle, but price did not return to the breakout point until later at the end of the green line marked "A". We then see rejection from this area.

B: At the origin of the green line, we can see price trades lower than the previous candle. Price quickly returns to the breakout point and rejects from the area of the green line marked "B".

It is possible that these zero lines can be traded away from then returned to several times.

[prochargedmopar]

My cognitive functionality has returned as far as I can tell.

This means I am going back to trading with what I learned from MightyOne.

I have nothing against ICT and FVGs but MightyOne was the best "mentor" .

I mean he explained things in a peculiar way, but he had a way to think about the market that resonates with me.

Zero Lines - Orderflow
Structure - Bias
Support and Resistance are traded through and tested not traded to - Bias
Time frames within timeframes - Risk Management

These things are what Ill mainly use.
They can be seen on the last chart I posted.

Hey Alias, exciting stuff.
I will be reading your posts with interest with questions in mind such as orderflow/z lines being identified on the current execution chart only? and how you identify structure/TF etc.
I watched the video Pro referred to from Dave doing structure on 1hr with validated highs and lows, will be interested to see what your version is.

What is the conceptual idea of the zline?

It is a point/price where buyers bought.
Price moves into profit.
Price returns back to the point where the buyer bought.
At this point in time the buyers are sitting with zero profit.

At face value it is merely a break and retest.
Most of these zero lines/break out points are returned to at some point.

This is the basis of orderflow, price moves up until sellers outnumber the buyers, price moves down until the buyers outnumber the sellers.
The orders tend to clump at the candle extremes. It can be observed on any timeframe. it is influenced by Stop Losses being placed at or near the break even price.

The edge comes from the high percentage of times price is rejected from the zero lines. We don't know how far price will reject only that much of the time it will reject and seek liquidity.

Note: If you believe in the 1 algo rules everything like ICT then none of this will make sense.

Friggin "I am the Algo" ICT.

Bahahahahahaah,

Yeah, he's the Algo alright, Cuz he is HUMAN>.

Charts been the same since they started putting them on paper. Doesn't matter if 90% of all trading is done by computers (OR MORE).
Humans did that $hit, and it's easy to take money from humans.

99% of all people who get jumped by multiple assailants will curl up in a ball. Sure Death.
99% of all people flinch or put up their arm when something swings at them. (drunks need not attempt this, gonna get whacked in the face). LOL

Human nature is the Algo.

Also, like I've said before. A newbie walks into a BJJ Dojo, he's toast. Everything he does is backwards to survival.
Newbie opens charts? It's a sure financial suicide.

Being risk averse is scared money and scared money ain't making any money at all, that's for sure.

Then steps in all the traders beliefs that were programmed into them as a child. Reinforced as adults and it's a BIG bag of Diks. LOL

[Don_xyZ]

To examples of what was described in the previous post.

A: At the origin of the green line, we can see a candle breaks lower than the previous candle, but price did not return to the breakout point until later at the end of the green line marked "A". We then see rejection from this area.

B: At the origin of the green line, we can see price trades lower than the previous candle. Price quickly returns to the breakout point and rejects from the area of the green line marked "B".

It is possible that these zero lines can be traded away from then returned to several times.

I believe in algo, but not 1.

Well, in truth, an algo is designed by people too. So yeah, that's that

I trade manually but the monitoring page says 65% of my trades are done by algo like FTwhat? It got confused coz I've been using an EA assistant (buttons)

As for ICT, his ego is on another level. But so is Dave.

[prochargedmopar]

To examples of what was described in the previous post.

A: At the origin of the green line, we can see a candle breaks lower than the previous candle, but price did not return to the breakout point until later at the end of the green line marked "A". We then see rejection from this area.

B: At the origin of the green line, we can see price trades lower than the previous candle. Price quickly returns to the breakout point and rejects from the area of the green line marked "B".

It is possible that these zero lines can be traded away from then returned to several times.

A lines up with a lower timeframe swing + gap above (the secret sauce)
B is in no man's land. It does line up with the 50% of multiple gaps and wicks though.

Screen Shot 2023-06-17 at 10.57.54 PM.png (56.82 KiB) Viewed 636 times

[Don_xyZ]

Hey Alias, exciting stuff.
I will be reading your posts with interest with questions in mind such as orderflow/z lines being identified on the current execution chart only? and how you identify structure/TF etc.
I watched the video Pro referred to from Dave doing structure on 1hr with validated highs and lows, will be interested to see what your version is.

What is the conceptual idea of the zline?

It is a point/price where buyers bought.
Price moves into profit.
Price returns back to the point where the buyer bought.
At this point in time the buyers are sitting with zero profit.

At face value it is merely a break and retest.
Most of these zero lines/break out points are returned to at some point.

This is the basis of orderflow, price moves up until sellers outnumber the buyers, price moves down until the buyers outnumber the sellers.
The orders tend to clump at the candle extremes. It can be observed on any timeframe. it is influenced by Stop Losses being placed at or near the break even price.

The edge comes from the high percentage of times price is rejected from the zero lines. We don't know how far price will reject only that much of the time it will reject and seek liquidity.

Note: If you believe in the 1 algo rules everything like ICT then none of this will make sense.

Friggin "I am the Algo" ICT.

Bahahahahahaah,

Yeah, he's the Algo alright, Cuz he is HUMAN>.

Charts been the same since they started putting them on paper. Doesn't matter if 90% of all trading is done by computers (OR MORE).
Humans did that $hit, and it's easy to take money from humans.

99% of all people who get jumped by multiple assailants will curl up in a ball. Sure Death.
99% of all people flinch or put up their arm when something swings at them. (drunks need not attempt this, gonna get whacked in the face). LOL

Human nature is the Algo.

Also, like I've said before. A newbie walks into a BJJ Dojo, he's toast. Everything he does is backwards to survival.
Newbie opens charts? It's a sure financial suicide.

Being risk averse is scared money and scared money ain't making any money at all, that's for sure.

Then steps in all the traders beliefs that were programmed into them as a child. Reinforced as adults and it's a BIG bag of Diks. LOL

Well, if you say that and use rich uncle then it runs contrary to what you're saying, no?

Also, who says scared money ain't making money at all?

Alias: say what?