kiwiarian wrote:I don't get the line chart one, but the MA7 and 19 with a bias I like, that will do for now until I reread and maybe get it later.
We'll just add a bunch a random data, that should make for a clearer picture
Moderator: moderators
kiwiarian wrote:I don't get the line chart one, but the MA7 and 19 with a bias I like, that will do for now until I reread and maybe get it later.
Yirbu wrote:Don_xyZ wrote:Yirbu wrote:
I like trading like this a lot but it's real easy for price to slap you all over the place.
Yes, don't do it.
You should read what you wrote first because it will show you your own problem, getting slapped all over the place. Fix that first and then maybe you'll see it differently.
However...
If you still can't find the solutions then don't do it.
If you prefer to be a bit more relaxed by using a bigger tf then don't do it.
If you prefer anchor trade type of trade then don't do it.
If you can't find a good strategy then don't do it.
If, if, if, ... (all the negative ifs) ... don't do it.
Simple as that.
I'm gonna crash out.
Well, I started with "I like..." I'm practicing it and getting slowly better.
It doesn't have to be perfect in the first month so I'll get there
IgazI wrote:Yirbu wrote:Don_xyZ wrote:More scalp. This time with SL.
ScreenHunter 25.png
as is.png
Line chart is more than sufficient.
Enough for the day. ?
I like trading like this a lot but it's real easy for price to slap you all over the place.
Trading is a lot like Backgammon; you just move your pieces to the other side of the board
I got a big slice of humble pie when I played a cash game against a far superior opponent:
you might think that you're "playing like him". . .but you're not, you're not
I just read Don's post, take notes, and see what I can do to improve my game.


IgazI wrote:kiwiarian wrote:I don't get the line chart one, but the MA7 and 19 with a bias I like, that will do for now until I reread and maybe get it later.
We'll just add a bunch a random data, that should make for a clearer picture![]()
fixed.png

IgazI wrote:kiwiarian wrote:I don't get the line chart one, but the MA7 and 19 with a bias I like, that will do for now until I reread and maybe get it later.
We'll just add a bunch a random data, that should make for a clearer picture![]()
fixed.png
kiwiarian wrote:IgazI wrote:kiwiarian wrote:I don't get the line chart one, but the MA7 and 19 with a bias I like, that will do for now until I reread and maybe get it later.
We'll just add a bunch a random data, that should make for a clearer picture![]()
fixed.png
LOL, I cheated and added candles the other day and I felt more comfortable with the extra data
kiwiarian wrote:IgazI wrote:kiwiarian wrote:I don't get the line chart one, but the MA7 and 19 with a bias I like, that will do for now until I reread and maybe get it later.
We'll just add a bunch a random data, that should make for a clearer picture![]()
fixed.png
On another topic, that Obsidian software for notetaking is really good, last night I was going through the NLA thread and making new topics on the different subjects in there and adding notes and screenshots looking for the 1/3 dot stuff. I found some screenshots on the body is profit, wick is a loss and realised I had it all wrong so now I have a categorised page on that topic.
I always thought it was one candle when people said body in profit etc.
It was two candles....
Anyway I missed it the first time and going back and re-reading things I am picking up so much more now.
Happy days


IgazI wrote:I've always plotted the line chart like this:
you can fit this whole chart in half the space without losing any information:
- two up-pointing wicks: resistance-line from last wick (like the first two bars on the chart).
- op-facing wicks: tradable closing range (like the '1-2-3-4' example)
- two dn-pointing wicks: support-line from last wick
The odd period is always the wick:
- minute 1, 3, 5, 7, . . .
- half the target period, as in minute 15 or 45.
If I want to further 'crush' the chart then I fit three data points into one bar using closing ranges.
PS: I do see the error in my plot. . .I'm not going to redo the whole thing for an example![]()
why_not_this.jpg



