Jhx wrote:
My difficulties with gathering stats to gain confidence is that I have a hard time determining "this entry is valid, this one isn't". The entry might be executed in the same way, but context is different, and in many cases that matters a lot.
In complete opposite scenarios it might be easier to say "ah, this makes sense because in case A price was like this and in B price was like that"; but the nuances in valid/invalid scenarios that at glance look similar gets me spinning in circles me every time and would make the foundation in which I build the stats useless.
It seems that context is really important but how one views the chart is subjective. There seems to be so much information to the left when you're about to enter. I don't know. Maybe I just haven't found a way to read the chart in a consistent manner. Are there any 'chart reading methods' out there?
I try not to over-analyse.
In my report I note the usual stuff and the things I would like to know at present, like "did I interfere with the trade?", "how many R's were max?", "what kind of setup was it?". For the latter I just note if it was an inside bar, a momo etc, etc.
Also I make a screenprint of all the trades and keep it for reference. (and every day I go through my reference book )
But aren't your rules to enter a trade not clear yet?
Oh, what I did see on your chart yesterday is that if you look at the first momo candle after price crossed the sma...all of these trades would have worked. Except for 1. Unfortunately you were in that trade...
It's not easy....hope today you've had some nice trades.