Kreslik.com - traders community since 2006

TRO IS STILL UNDER ATTACK AT FOREX FACTORY

Unread Feb 14, 2009 12:45pm (5 hr ago)
wiztrader's Avatar
wiztrader
At your service!

Member Since Oct 2008
110 Posts
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by vladv View Post
wiztrader,I think that some of his indics are TRO's donational ones!That's why he isn't sharing with us......

oh, I see.



MODS WARNING LIGTHS.

TRO IS A SELLER IN DISGUISE.

BE CAREFUL.



ORIGINAL POST


==========================================

It's unreal the stuff people post about me.

Perhaps a few of you can set the record straight over there.

I've been banned for #3.
Lifted: NEVER.

They S*CK.

Read my whole post. I see no infraction and only provided passionate information.
Pro

Rule #3: No Sellers on the Forum
Commercial agendas tend to compromise the integrity of forum discussions and are therefore not permitted.* If you make money by servicing Forex traders in any way, shape, or form, or have any commercial agenda whatsoever, you are NOT permitted to post in the forums regardless of whether your posts are promotional or not.

Members with less than 100 posts should refrain from asking about or discussing commercial Forex products, services, or websites. This includes both positive AND negative discussions. A new member discussing or asking for opinions about a commercial Forex venture is the first warning sign of a hidden agenda. Without a posting history, it's hard to determine your credibility, so your post may be mistaken as promotional. If your post or thread is moved (to the Recycle Bin) it?s most likely because it was suspected as spam. Please don?t take this personally as the Site Managers deal with a high volume of spam and don?t have time to thoroughly investigate every instance. Once you develop a track record on the forums it?ll be easy to see that you have no hidden agenda and you?ll be free to join discussions related to products, services, and websites.

An exception to this rule is made for FF Partners and Advertisers.

*If you service the Forex industry, you?re welcome to promote your business by submitting analysis, press releases, and other newsworthy items in the News section.

Found this in my banned pm from moderator twee.

Moderator Notes:
Rule 3, TRO.

???Is he trying to say I'm TRO under an alias. Or just my association to TRO was enough???

prochargedmopar wrote:Found this in my banned pm from moderator twee.

Moderator Notes:
Rule 3, TRO.

???Is he trying to say I'm TRO under an alias. Or just my association to TRO was enough???

"Please don?t take this personally as the Site Managers deal with a high volume of spam and [highlight=red]don?t have time[/highlight] to thoroughly investigate every instance."

Not having time means having other priorities. TRO is doomed, and so are you

I wouldn't waste my time on this. They are shooting themselves in the foot.

prochargedmopar wrote:Found this in my banned pm from moderator twee.

Moderator Notes:
Rule 3, TRO.

???Is he trying to say I'm TRO under an alias. Or just my association to TRO was enough???

They thought that you were me!!

FF is so paranoid.

if ForexFactory think itself mighty enough to lose
such great contributor as TRO - they are stupid.
it's a pitty, however, that TRO could lose lots of leads from this
site.

I don't understand, in whose interests is to bun TRO and rise all this rubbish about. It definetely not in the best interests of army of usual traders, but it maybe in interests of some crazy group of people, who could blaim everyone & everything for their mizerable gains.

TRO, what is your best advice on the matter?

if ForexFactory think itself mighty enough to lose
such great contributor as TRO - they are stupid.
it's a pitty, however, that TRO could lose lots of leads from this
site.

I don't understand, in whose interests is to bun TRO and rise all this rubbish about. It definetely not in the best interests of army of usual traders, but it maybe in interests of some crazy group of people, who could blaim everyone & everything for their mizerable gains.

TRO, what is your best advice on the matter?

TRO, what is your best advice on the matter?

Focus on your trade.

I will post some AATM pics in the near future. Also, I want to note something about the detractors that seem to be hounding you.

I do not value all of TRO's indicators. While I have not researched all of them it is fair to say that some TRO indicators will work better for different trading styles and for people with different attributes.

There are a handful of TRO indicators that suit my trading and my methodology development extreemly well. None of those are applied exactly the way TRO wrote them.

There are also a few TRO indicators that I looked at and decided that they where not suitable for me.

I advise anyone interested in trading to evaluate things for themselves, to keep what is useful and to discard what is not useful. To spend a great deal of time on negative feedback is a window into the experience of the author. Evaluate feedback both positive and negative the same way...learn from what is useful.

TRO is not deserving of the recent onslaught...it seems personal and contains little if any useful information.

I do have a huge concern about a high percentage of what I see posted, even on the various boards within this site.

New traders looking for the Holy Grail and almost always looking for something for nothing. I've seen posts that ask "What are the best settings to make money using moving average crossover?" Has anyone developed Tom DeMark sequential into an indicator?"

Think about how you communicate and what it says about you as a trader and as a person. TRO does not deserve the attentive critics that seem to follow him everywhere. Evaluate his work for what it represents to you, keep or build on what is useful and develop your own methods. Investigate for yourself and do your own evaluation of what you find. Remember that you have an obligation to return value where value has been received. DB
I will post some AATM pics in the near future. Also, I want to note something about the detractors that seem to be hounding you.

I do not value all of TRO's indicators. While I have not researched all of them it is fair to say that some TRO indicators will work better for different trading styles and for people with different attributes.

There are a handful of TRO indicators that suit my trading and my methodology development extreemly well. None of those are applied exactly the way TRO wrote them.

There are also a few TRO indicators that I looked at and decided that they where not suitable for me.

I advise anyone interested in trading to evaluate things for themselves, to keep what is useful and to discard what is not useful. To spend a great deal of time on negative feedback is a window into the experience of the author. Evaluate feedback both positive and negative the same way...learn from what is useful.

TRO is not deserving of the recent onslaught...it seems personal and contains little if any useful information.

I do have a huge concern about a high percentage of what I see posted, even on the various boards within this site.

New traders looking for the Holy Grail and almost always looking for something for nothing. I've seen posts that ask "What are the best settings to make money using moving average crossover?" Has anyone developed Tom DeMark sequential into an indicator?"

Think about how you communicate and what it says about you as a trader and as a person. TRO does not deserve the attentive critics that seem to follow him everywhere. Evaluate his work for what it represents to you, keep or build on what is useful and develop your own methods. Investigate for yourself and do your own evaluation of what you find. Remember that you have an obligation to return value where value has been received. DBI will post some AATM pics in the near future. Also, I want to note something about the detractors that seem to be hounding you.

I do not value all of TRO's indicators. While I have not researched all of them it is fair to say that some TRO indicators will work better for different trading styles and for people with different attributes.

There are a handful of TRO indicators that suit my trading and my methodology development extreemly well. None of those are applied exactly the way TRO wrote them.

There are also a few TRO indicators that I looked at and decided that they where not suitable for me.

I advise anyone interested in trading to evaluate things for themselves, to keep what is useful and to discard what is not useful. To spend a great deal of time on negative feedback is a window into the experience of the author. Evaluate feedback both positive and negative the same way...learn from what is useful.

TRO is not deserving of the recent onslaught...it seems personal and contains little if any useful information.

I do have a huge concern about a high percentage of what I see posted, even on the various boards within this site.

New traders looking for the Holy Grail and almost always looking for something for nothing. I've seen posts that ask "What are the best settings to make money using moving average crossover?" Has anyone developed Tom DeMark sequential into an indicator?"

Think about how you communicate and what it says about you as a trader and as a person. TRO does not deserve the attentive critics that seem to follow him everywhere. Evaluate his work for what it represents to you, keep or build on what is useful and develop your own methods. Investigate for yourself and do your own evaluation of what you find. Remember that you have an obligation to return value where value has been received. DB