Kreslik.com - traders community since 2006

Hello again,

This is indicator is from a site that ripped it off from a web forum (forex-tsd to be precise). We are told that this is 90% accurate... well, I don't know if that's true. If it is, then the 3 ZZ semaphore seems to be a good exit strategy for it.

I may be a noob, but things like this have my skepticism high since I have had my share of false-signal-generating indicators all too often. Has anyone ever heard of this?

Note: When the lines cross, you buy or sell (Blue X = buy, Red X = sell). Plus it has an "alert" for when the lines cross.

patriotstef,

I'm beginning to not take you serious as you keep coming back with endless new questions. Are you pulling our chains?
Have you read the information provided on this site?
This forum has proven methods for successfully trading the forex markets. TRO has provided very specific strategies that work. If you are serious dig in and read about the strategies of the buyZone, Drain the banks, etc. TRO and mightyOne have provided specific indepth methods in the Never Lose again threads. You don't need to re-invent the wheel. It's all right here on this site. Many of us here successfully trade for a living. Open a demo account and start trading the methods to see if you are cut out for this business. I wish you the best of success my friend.

I don't think so.
This indicator is available for free, search on google: kwatr nina

If you search on google: eko cahyono
The first result is: http://www.automatictradingmastery.com/content/view/20/37/

Om, no I'm not pulling anyone's chain. I have read the information on this site and I've seen other people here do the same thing I'm doing. There've got to be almost a dozen "drain the banks" and the "never lose again" thread is over 400 pages long. I'm in the beginner's forum here for obvious reasons... filtering the good from the unnecessary data.

I have full confidence that TRO, TheMightyOne and the rest of you know what you're doing - I never denied that from the start. Unfortunately, a PhD in physics trying to explain quantum mechanics to 10 year-year-old is most likely not going to realize the child's level of understanding. The PhD may know exactly what he's talking about, but the 10-year-old certainly doesn't. It's all a matter of delivery (not so much the experience) when it comes to classifying the best teachers in the world.

I thank all of you for all the valuable data I've received here.