LeMercenaire wrote:Welcome back, Mr.D!
Thanks, Mr. Lem! Will continue to post findings of MightyOne's nuggets.
Moderator: moderators
LeMercenaire wrote:Welcome back, Mr.D!
Mr. D wrote:So, let's see how many people are reading this thread and try something practical, that is trade MO's style. Let's take his Box and combine with Z-lines.
http://joxi.net/p27nP6BCole4Om
LeMercenaire wrote:Mr. D wrote:So, let's see how many people are reading this thread and try something practical, that is trade MO's style. Let's take his Box and combine with Z-lines.
http://joxi.net/p27nP6BCole4Om
Here's my take.
USDCHF H1
Screenshot 2019-02-25 at 18.22.35 - Edited.png
I see the Z-Line as the one added here. For me that's the major Z-Line and any others from the other indi are only of interest down on the lower time frames as a way of fine-tuning an entry.
Anyway, before I get to that, there is obviously the point that an argument could be made for one heading in the opposite direction earlier. In fact, if I was to use m own keys, then the short would actually have made more sense. However, those same keys would have kept me out of the ultimately losing (or more likely a non-triggered) trade (the U-MACD never crossed back over).
As far as the one I have marked, trading it naked would have bagged just fine. Adding my other ''stuff'' would have nixed it though.